The Seattle City Council is now considering legislation that would allow homeowners to build a small detached structure on their yards, but not everyone is in favor of it.
The Laurelhurst Community Club has raised objections to the Seattle City Council, saying that backyard cottages would increase demand for on-street parking, and take away privacy from neighbors.
Club President Jeannie Hale told the Planning, Land Use and Neighborhoods Committee of the City Council at a recent meeting that allowing these buildings would hurt the character of the single-family neighborhoods. "We would like you all to consider that all neighborhoods are not the same. One size does not fit all in our city," she said.
"Some areas, urban villages, need to have increased density," she said. But, she added in a written statement to the council, allowing the detached buildings is "essentially duplexing single-family neighborhoods."
A pilot program has allowed backyard cottages in Southeast Seattle for the past three years, and the proposed legislation would allow them all over the city. The cottages, or detached accessory dwelling units, as they're called in the text of the legislation, would be allowed on lots larger than 4,000 square feet, and owners would still have to adhere to the rule that no more than 35 percent of their lot could be covered by a structure.
Councilwoman Sally Clark, who is the chairwoman of the Planning, Land Use and Neighborhood Committee, said that cottages won't amount to duplexing because the maximum number of unrelated people who can live on the property will remain the same at eight. Also, the property owner will be required to live in one of the structures at least six months out of the year.
"The desire is not to create two rentals, it's to help someone pay their mortgage, or to get older on their property, or to make a room for a son or daughter moving back home," Clark said.
At a meeting of the Planning, Land Use and Neighborhoods Committee on Wednesday, council members discussed how stringent the standards need to be on the cottages, debating the number that can be built each year in the city, whether parking will be required, how many square feet the cottages can have in their floorplans, and how tall they can be.
Councilman Tim Burgess expressed some concern about neighbors' privacy. The city's Department of Planning and Development needs to be able to do more than just offer helpful suggestions for how to protect neighbors' privacy when planning where to put windows on the cottages, he said.
"I'm worried that we're going to create an adversarial environment with no solution. And then people are really going to be ticked off," he said.
One homeowner, John Stoeck, 47, of the Pritchard Beach neighborhood, is building a cottage now on the site of an old garage. He said he's enjoyed designing it, and he's planning to search for a renter when it's finished.
"I think it can be a positive thing to add density without tearing down houses and putting up apartments or condos. It's one way to preserve basic character of the neighborhood," he said.
One challenge he predicted for people wanting to convert garages into cottages is that the cottages have to have a certain amount of setback from property lines, and most garages are too close to property lines to fit in to the standards. He was able to get city to sign off on his cottage, but the permitting process made it more difficult for him.
The proposed legislation is scheduled to come up at a meeting of the Planning, Land Use and Neighborhood Committee on Oct. 8 at 9 a.m. at City Hall.
More information on the backyard cottages legislation is available on the city's Web site at: http://www.seattle.gov/dpd/Planning/Backyardcottages/Overview/